Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 10:34

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Yankees Star Responds To Red Sox Rookie’s Viral Quote - NESN
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
NASCAR Saturday schedule at Pocono Raceway - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are the best AI tools for recruiting?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Hey girls can we see some anal play?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Scientists Stunned by Evidence of Ancient Birds Nested in the Arctic - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Dave Chappelle and Mo Amer on Politics and Comedy, SNL Monologues - Variety
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Nintendo Switch 2 doubles FPS of Switch 1’s “worst” performing games - Dexerto
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear: